Accessing torrent sites in France involves bypassing several layers of technical blocks, some of which evolve without additional judicial intervention. The question is no longer just about choosing a VPN, but understanding which mechanisms actually filter traffic and which protections withstand these filters.
ARCOM Blocks and Encrypted DNS: What Has Changed for Torrent Sites
ARCOM (formerly Hadopi) now applies dynamic blocks capable of automatically targeting mirrors and clones of the same site without the need for a new court decision for each domain. A site like The Pirate Bay can see its copies fall in a cascade as soon as they appear.
You may also like : How much to invest in a SCPI to maximize returns?
This tightening has made a simple URL change insufficient. Users who were content to look for a new mirror find that it sometimes disappears within a few days. Two technical workarounds still work against this type of filtering:
- Replacing the DNS of your internet service provider with encrypted DNS (DoH or DoT) prevents filtering at the domain name resolution level, which remains the most common blocking mechanism in France.
- Using a VPN shifts DNS resolution to the VPN provider’s servers, out of reach of injunctions directed at French ISPs.
- Using a dedicated torrent proxy, like Proxybay, allows access to an index without altering your overall network configuration.
For those looking for a quick solution, it is still possible to access Proxybay securely via a standard browser, provided this method is combined with an active VPN.
You may also like : How to react in case of a blockage or access issue with your online trading account
VPN for Torrents: Comparing Audited No-Logs Policies
All VPN providers claim a “no-logs” policy. The difference lies in the independent verification of this claim. Recent French-language comparisons (01net, Journal du Geek) have begun to distinguish VPNs based on a specific criterion: the existence of a recent external audit of the data retention policy.
| Criterion | VPN with Recent Independent Audit | VPN without Public Audit |
|---|---|---|
| Verified no-logs policy | Yes (report available) | Declarative only |
| Server infrastructure | 100% RAM servers (no hard drives) | Variable, sometimes standard disks |
| Removal of servers in high-risk countries | Practiced (India, Russia removed by some) | Rarely documented |
| Relevance for torrenting | High: no exploitable trace in case of seizure | Uncertain: depends on the provider’s good faith |
NordVPN and ExpressVPN are among the services that have published recent audit results. In contrast, a free VPN generally offers neither an audit nor RAM infrastructure, making it unsuitable for downloading files via torrent.
A 100% RAM server retains no data after a reboot, which provides a structural protection much more reliable than a simple contractual promise.
Onion over VPN: An Additional Layer of Anonymity for Downloading
VPN guides for 2026 highlight a feature still little associated with torrenting: the Onion over VPN service. This mode routes traffic through the Tor network without requiring the installation of the Tor browser.
The principle is simple: the VPN first encrypts the connection, then routes it to a Tor entry node. The visible IP address on exit is neither that of the user nor that of the VPN server, but that of a Tor node. To access blocked torrent sites, this double layer significantly complicates any tracing attempts.
The trade-off is a decrease in speed. The Tor network adds latency, which slows down the downloading of large files (movies, series, games). This method is more suitable for browsing indexes and retrieving .torrent files than for the P2P transfer itself. Using Onion over VPN for browsing, then a standard VPN for downloading is a reasonable compromise.
Client-Side Torrent Checks: Settings Most Guides Overlook
Choosing a VPN is not enough if the BitTorrent client leaks information. Two settings deserve special attention.
The first concerns the kill switch integrated into the torrent client. Some software (qBittorrent, for example) allows linking traffic to a specific network interface, that of the VPN. If the VPN connection drops, the client stops all transfers instead of switching to the unprotected connection.
The second concerns DNS leaks. Even with an active VPN, a poorly configured client may send DNS requests via the ISP’s resolver. Activating DNS leak protection in the VPN settings and checking with an online DNS test tool remains a step often overlooked.
These settings take a few minutes. Their absence can make a paid VPN as transparent as an unprotected connection to ARCOM or a rights holder monitoring IP addresses on a torrent swarm. A VPN without an activated kill switch offers less protection than one might think.
Downloading torrents in France relies on a stack of protections: encrypted DNS or VPN to bypass blocks, audited no-logs policy to limit traces, client configuration to avoid leaks. None of these layers work alone. The strength of the whole depends on the weakest link in the chain.